Modeling the MG1.6
Ed Grochowski
Written 3-1-2024
Introduction
The MG1.6 is a planar electromagnetic loudspeaker manufactured by
Magnepan from 1999 to 2010. Unlike conventional speakers, the MG1.6 is
a dipole, radiating sound equally to the front and rear. This enables
the MG1.6 to reproduce sounds with a high degree of realism.
The downside of a dipole is that cancellation occurs between the front
and rear waves when wavelengths become greater than the speaker's width.
A dipole speaker must compensate by boosting low frequencies.
This article examines how the MG1.6 achieves the necessary boost.
Model
To understand the MG1.6, I constructed a model of the crossover and
panel. The crossover can be modeled exactly from the schematic.
The crossover's high-pass section has a -3dB frequency of 1.6KHz and a
slope of 6dB/octave. The low-pass section has a -3dB frequency of 230Hz
and an ultimate slope of 12dB/octave. The MG1.6's crossover has an
unusually wide gap between the high-pass and low-pass sections.
The crossover model is combined with an idealized panel model as shown
below.
HP |
Crossover high-pass filter |
LP |
Crossover low-pass filter |
HG |
High-pass gain |
LG |
Low-pass gain |
Sum |
RMS sum |
P1-4 |
Panel section |
G1-4 |
Panel gain |
The HG and LG blocks adjust the crossover's output by 11dB to reflect
the lower efficiency of the tweeter relative to the woofer.
The panel consists of four sections separated by tuning dots. The left
and right speakers have slightly different tunings. I modeled the right
speaker by substituting each panel section with a mechanical
spring-mass-damper which is equivalent to an electrical second-order
high-pass filter.
For each section, the model assumes that the resonance frequency is
inversely proportional to the square root of the area (mass). The gain
is proportional to the area. I chose a Q factor to produce the desired
response. These parameters are summarized below.
Section |
Area (in^2) |
F (Hz) |
Q |
Gain |
1 |
60 |
99 |
1.8 |
-13dB |
2 |
130 |
67 |
2.2 |
-6dB |
3 |
145 |
63 |
2.2 |
-5dB |
4 |
265 |
47 |
4.5 |
0dB |
Simulation
The overall response is as follows.
Green: Crossover low-pass,
Red: Crossover high-pass,
Blue: Crossover and panel,
Teal: Ideal
The graph has five distinct regions.
- Below 47Hz, the output drops like a rock
- From 47Hz to 200Hz, the combination of the four panel resonances provides boost
- From 200Hz to 700Hz, the crossover's low-pass filter provides boost
- The output reaches a local minimum at 1.4KHz
- From 1.4KHz to 5KHz, the crossover's high-pass filter contributes a 2dB rise
The 2dB dip at 1.4KHz is a typical speaker voicing that gives the
impression of an extended frequency response albeit with some loss of
coherency. The dip may be reduced by adding a small resistor to
attenuate the tweeter.
The corner frequency of 700Hz is where the sound's wavelength exactly
matches the speaker's width (19 inches).
The simulated speaker does a remarkably good job of compensating for
dipole cancellation. Moreover, it does so with no additional components
in the crossover. This is clever engineering.
Measurement
At midrange and treble frequencies, the measured response exhibits
similar characteristics as the simulation. At bass frequencies, the
effects of the rear wave and room resonances cause the measured response
to differ. In addition, some 60/120Hz hum is present in my test setup.
Green: Measurement (1 meter),
Blue: Simulation (RMS sum),
Red: Simulation (complex sum)
At bass frequencies, the wavelengths are long and so phase matters. The
phase changes rapidly as each panel section passes through resonance.
The complex sum attempts to model the combined output at the point seen
by the microphone.
The null at 140Hz is caused by the reflection of the rear wave from the
wall behind the speaker.
The excess output around 1KHz and above 8KHz is due to beaming as
wavelengths approach the widths of the woofer and tweeter, respectively.
I think the measurement and simulation agree closely enough that the
model can claim to be correct.
|